So, I asked the question: "Do you see a time when, understanding that the user has a shopping type query, you would show only commercial results" (as in paid-for advertising). And both pondered for a second or two and then agreed on, most likely.
Google is forever testing and every now and again we get to see something that makes you go - wow- never seen that before. Certainly that's what happened to me last night. I'm in the (slow and arduous) process of furnishing a new apartment. So, I did a search for "night stands" (that would be bedside table in the UK).
The page was littered with paid results, a small amount of organic results and some shopping results mixed in (even the paid ads to the right had images in them, you'll note).
![]()
Look again even more closely and you'll see that, the top three paid results all have a +plus box in them. Clicking on the first one sends the few visible organic results plummeting with a series of product images. But, of course, when you hit the second plus box, it's goodbye completely to any visibility of organic listings. For the first time in my experience, I was looking at a page full of paid ads and not a single organic listing to be seen.
![]()
And then, I had to hit the third +plus box, at which point the organic listings do a type of Jules Verne and start heading towards the center of the earth!
But here's the thing... I wasn't disappointed at all to see only paid listings. I was sitting with a credit card ready to buy (I have no time to actually visit stores so I do everything online) and the selection/choices were just what I was looking for.
Is it such a bad thing to serve up only paid results for a transactional type query or only organic listings for an informational query do you think?











